Thanks for the nudge Pat ;). I'm still here, but unfortunately I'm limited in time to properly manage the module. I think we have a couple of roles that need filling.
Roles: 1. Someone(people) who will actively participate, manage the mailing list and JIRA (bug, issues, etc.) 2. Someone to envision, lead forward progress. I think we have competent people that can contribute but we need someone who is willing to delegate, coordinate, critique, manage. Priorities: 1. Finish and deliver 1.3. 2. Plan, delegate, work on 2.0. I think we have eager people wanting to participate but we lack good leadership at this point to effectively leverage the potential help. I'll be happy to help and I'm sure Rickard is still willing to help as well. -Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "os-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "os-ww" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:53 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Calling all developers: Modules owners > OK, well since Maurice bowed out, and Matt has been MIA (I know you're out > there Matt, you can't hide forever!), we need a new owner/maintainer for > WebWork. I'd volunteer to do it myself, but being that I'm the current owner > for OSCore, OSUser, PropertySet, Clickstream, and OSWorkflow -- and that I > don't have nearly enough time for even one of those right now, I shouldn't > take on WebWork. I'd be fine handling OSWF and WebWork, though. But no more > than two for me. > > So that means... I'd like to start shuffling around ownership of these > modules. None of this can happen overnight, since we need to see dedication > before handing over the reigns, otherwise we don't get anywhere. If anyone > would like to volunteer for OSCore, OSUser, PropertySet, Clickstream, or > WebWork, please write back to the mailing list. We need some good, dedicated > people. Only reply back if you really feel you can do a good job. This isn't > a huge job -- maybe a few hours a week at the most, but it's important that > you be consistent (you can't disappear for weeks on end). > > I know I'll be keeping a hold of OSWorkflow for now. I've got a lot of ideas > and familiarity with WebWork as well, but I can't take it unless others > offer to lighten my other loads. Alternatively, if there is anyone else out > there qualified and has the time, please start talking about who can take on > managing WebWork. Either way, I'd like for anyone interested in OSCore, > OSUser, PropertySet, or Clickstream to get back to me (cc the list) as well. > > OK, that's it. > > -Pat > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET > comprehensive development tool, built to increase your > productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
