I'm sure you could work around your second problem by supplying your own jsp
xml syntax templates.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Rosi-Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Barbara Rosi-Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:27 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Using the JPS's XML syntax with Webwork and Sitemesh


> Hi,
>
> I am building a site with Sitemesh and Webwork and I am having two
> problems that I would appreciate assistance with.  We have adopted doing
> all of our JSP development using the XML compliant syntax rather than
> the older JSP propriatary syntax. Both problems I have relate to this.
> For the record I am using Sitemesh 1.5, Webwork 1.2.1 and I am running
> on JBoss 3.2 with Tomcat 4.1.12 embedded. These are running on RH Linux
> 7.3 with Java  1.4.1.
>
> The first problem, is that when I do a very simple JSP page using the
> xml syntax with a page as such:
>
>     <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>     <jsp:root
>         version="1.2"
>         xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page";
>       >
>
>         <html>
>             <head>
>                 <title>User registration</title>
>             </head>
>            <body>
>            </body>
>         </html>
>     </jsp:root>
>
> the page shows but there is no Sitemesh wrapping present. If I
> substitute plain HTML or JSP propriatary syntax into the same jsp file,
> then Sitemesh wraps the page just fine. My understading was that
> Sitemesh did not care how the page content was produced, so this
> behaviour is very surprising to me.
>
> The second problem is more basic. Is it even possible to use the Webwork
> taglibs in jps that uses the xml syntax? So far my testing has indicated
> that this does not work and my guess is that it is because the taglibs
> use templates that spew out the old style JSP.  So in the end I am
> trying to mix oil and water. Is this accuarate? If so, would translating
> the templates resolve the issue or are there more fundamental changes
> that would have to be applied to the taglib library itself?
>
> - joel
>
>
> [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to