Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Well, personally I think that performance outwins any language feature discussions on this one. We've all seen how badly the ValueStack.findValue() method performs currently, and that NEEDS to be fixed. Do you have a reference for the OGNL syntax? Are there any major differences with WW EL?So the current XWork code uses the existing WW expression language as is, only using Ognl for setting/getting properties as well as type conversion. I was playing with making an OgnlValueStack and it's literally 10 lines of code and MUCH faster. I was thinking that between JSTL and Ognl, the need for the WW EL might be pretty low. As I've stated before, WebWork->XWork migration should be a drop-in replacement, no code changes or configuration tweaks. So that means the WW EL will still be around, but what do you guys think of starting to promote Ognl as the query language of choice?The only feature not quite in the OgnlValueStack (and I'm working on this) is the concept of moving up levels from the stack head via "..". So asking for "../name" isn;t recognized. Anyway, just throwing the idea out there. Whatcha think?
/Rickard
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
