Rickard, I haven't done any decent benchmarks, but I did run some very simple tests, and after Ognl's expressions were cached and the first few action requests were sent through, I was getting responses in the ~5-10ms range. Things could probably be speed up even more, especially in the area of action chaning, where the algorithm is essentially O(n^3) and could be trimmed down quite a bit using smarter but more complicated code.
Also, all my work has been on JDK 1.4, so if I see decent speed and you're seeing crappy performance on JDK 1.3, that could also be a cause. -Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 2:49 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork in CVS > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > OK, as you may have seen, XWork is in the sandbox CVS module. I'd like you > > all to take a look at it and let me know what you think. The main changes > > are: > <snip> > > I'll take a closer look at it soonish. > > One Q though: do you have any thoughts on performance? In the old WW > there was some overhead with calling an action, and I'd like that > overhead to be as minimal as possible. Any way we can handle that? > > A clean design is the most important, but if we can get decent > performance at the same time that is also very very important. > > /Rickard > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
