My point precisely. I think, given the current culture of XWork, we're looking at WW 2.0 (major revision change) instead of XWork... and the "webwork" name becomes appropriate.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michael Blake Day wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you all rename WebWork to XWork > because WebWork was a misnomer? If the framework remains web-centric, why > not just call it WebWork 1.4? > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
