I like webwork head cvs, and want to see it keep moving forward. We can tag a release (1.3) anytime now, really. Only thing that perhaps needs doing is updating some of the docs, and having decent release notes. xwork is still sandbox, and is nowhere near production worthy (right?) and I'd much rather than those of us who enjoy webwork and contributing to it don't end up feeling like second class citizens in favour of xwork.
Quoting Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > People have been adding new stuff, like the Velocity based templates, > while the head is still (as far as I know) supposed to be 1.3 RC2. I > like new stuff (see Xwork), but we really need to branch 1.3 to keep it > clean of new stuff so we can develop against the head. If we end up > needing to release 1.3.1 or somesuch to fix bugs, then we'll need the > 1.3 source tree as a base to work from without keeping people from > moving forward. > > Jason > > -- > Jason Carreira > Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. > phone: 585.240.2793 > fax: 585.272.8118 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
