hi patrick,
i use webworks 1.3, and i dont see any ActionInvocation class in the javadoc?
is that from webworks 2.0?

how do i call my own action in 1.3?

sincerely
morten wilken
>-- Original Message --
>From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] a question about actions
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:34:36 -0800
>
>
>I agree, this is a pretty unique situation that doesn't fit the paradigm
>that ServletDispatcher follows. It doesn't follow the one used by
>FilterDispatcher either. Your best bet is to write yourself a Filter that
>works like so:
>
>1) parses the HTTP request location and matches it against the regex
>2) pulls out the information from the regexp (the 123 from "123.action")
>3) puts that 123 in to the parameters map
>4) creates a new ActionInvocation object with the correct action name
>5) calls actionInvocation.invoke()
>
>-Pat
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:57 AM
>Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] a question about actions
>
>
>> Actually, it might be easier / better to use a Filter here which ran
the
>> correct action instead of trying to shoehorn this into the regular
>> Webwork ServletDispatcher. Don't know if Patrick's FilterDispatcher
>> would work for this or not.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jason Carreira
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:54 AM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] a question about actions
>> >
>> >
>> > As opposed to
>> >
>> > http://localhost/cms/document.action?id=12124
>> >
>> > ?
>> >
>> > Maybe it's possible... We'd have to use regex or somesuch
>> > when looking up action configs... Could be a lot of overhead
>> > (as opposed to a quick map lookup).
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:43 AM
>> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] a question about actions
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Actually, when I saw this, a huge light went off in my head.
>> > > This would be PERFECT for a CMS-type system: imagine an action like:
>> > >
>> > > http://localhost/cms/12124.action
>> > >
>> > > ... where "12124" was actually a document key!
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Not currently. What's the case where you'd want to do this?
>> > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:40 AM
>> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > > Subject: [OS-webwork] a question about actions
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > hi all,
>> > > > > is it possible to use wildcards or something to map actions?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > like
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [0-9].action=DoSomething
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > sincerely
>> > > > > morten wilken
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> > > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
>> > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > >
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webw
>> ork
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
>> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------
>> > Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> > Welcome to geek heaven.
>> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>> >
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to