On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:46:14PM -0800, Jason Carreira wrote: > The idea for Xwork is to make this a core part of the framework, so it's > not implemented only in ActionSupport, and to make it done by the > ActionInvocation, rather than inside the execute() base method. In this > way, you don't have to save a "command" property in your Action > (although we could still do this too), but just have it call the other > method instead of execute.
CommandDriven isn't just implemented by ActionSupport, the ServletDispatcher must support it too. Otherwise it could not handle the !xxxx part in the Action name. -billy. -- Meisterbohne Söflinger Straße 100 Tel: +49-731-399 499-0 eLösungen 89077 Ulm Fax: +49-731-399 499-9
msg01942/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
