I think this is a good idea, no need to reinvent the wheel.

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Dave Johnson wrote:

>
> That certainly sounds cool. I'll be watch and learn
> from the masters.
>
> Another approach might be to build around Blojsom
> (http://blojsom.sourceforge.net), a light-weight Java
> blogging system based on Rael Dornfest's Perl-based bloxsom.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>
> > Well, we may want to do some things differently than you have
> > previously done. XWork provides a very nice (but simple) "component
> > container" similar to Avalon. What that means is we can use Inversion
> > of Control to integrate our WebWork actions with the backend code in a
> > much more "hands off" approach. If we write the whole thing (or at
> > least some level more than the UI) we can showcase XWork/WebWork
> > entirely, not just it's UI features.
> >
> > -Pat
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Johnson"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:38 AM
> > Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Webwork 2.0 example app
> >
> >
> >
> > >This sounds great. It would be nice if we could coordinate
> > >on the non-presentation portions of the app so that we can
> > >share some backend code.
> > >
> > >For example...
> > >
> > >Only the Roller Editor UI uses Struts: the page and RSS
> > >generation are done using Velocity and the backend is
> > >just Castor (soon to be Hibernate). The quickest way for
> > >you to get up and running would be to use the Roller
> > >backend and just rewrite the editor UI using WebWork
> > >and SiteMesh.
> > >
> > >- Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >Jason Carreira wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
> > >>
> > >>Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
> > >>RSSLibJ.
> > >>
> > >>Roller is annoying me because of
> > >>a) performance and crashing issues, and
> > >>b) Support for PostgreSql is poor
> > >>:-)
> > >>
> > >>Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app
> > >>should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the
> > >>features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a
> > >>showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers.
> > >>
> > >>Jason
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Jason Carreira
> > >>Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
> > >>phone: 585.240.2793
> > >>  fax: 585.272.8118
> > >>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>---
> > >>Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-------------------------------------------------------
> > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >>Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>

---------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to