Yup, I personally like SnipSnap, but it's got a lot of missing features that
make it just not good enough. Mainly:

1) Email notifications
2) Revision history
3) File attachments
4) WikiNaming support (I hate doing [Foo Bar], I like FooBar)

While I'd love to see an OpenSymphony branded Wiki (or better yet,
WikiBlog!), I think SnipSnap is decent. If enough people want to REALLY help
write a better WikiBlog that does all of the basics as well as some of the
stuff above, I'm willing to help out -- but I don't have too much time to
offer.

I wouldn't recommend re-inventing the wheel and competing against SnipSnap,
except for the fact that SnipSnap uses some funky technologies that I think
we could do a better job (OSCache, SiteMesh, WebWork 2.0)

-Pat


> Speaking of Wiki's, did anyone else see this:
>
> http://snipsnap.org/space/Radeox
>
> They've made their wiki rendering engine (the thing that takes the plain
text and simple formatting commands and turns it into XHTML) a separate
module you can plug in.
>
> Could be a nice data entry option for the Xwork blog... Could also be nice
for Joe's Wiki...

<snip>

> > *coughthewikicough*
> >
> > But I guess that sort of thing is already forgotten. Maybe
> > someone will care if the OS wiki is trashed because it sucks
> > and doesn't store old versions.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to