Yup, I personally like SnipSnap, but it's got a lot of missing features that make it just not good enough. Mainly:
1) Email notifications 2) Revision history 3) File attachments 4) WikiNaming support (I hate doing [Foo Bar], I like FooBar) While I'd love to see an OpenSymphony branded Wiki (or better yet, WikiBlog!), I think SnipSnap is decent. If enough people want to REALLY help write a better WikiBlog that does all of the basics as well as some of the stuff above, I'm willing to help out -- but I don't have too much time to offer. I wouldn't recommend re-inventing the wheel and competing against SnipSnap, except for the fact that SnipSnap uses some funky technologies that I think we could do a better job (OSCache, SiteMesh, WebWork 2.0) -Pat > Speaking of Wiki's, did anyone else see this: > > http://snipsnap.org/space/Radeox > > They've made their wiki rendering engine (the thing that takes the plain text and simple formatting commands and turns it into XHTML) a separate module you can plug in. > > Could be a nice data entry option for the Xwork blog... Could also be nice for Joe's Wiki... <snip> > > *coughthewikicough* > > > > But I guess that sort of thing is already forgotten. Maybe > > someone will care if the OS wiki is trashed because it sucks > > and doesn't store old versions. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork