Documentation will be fantastic :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Salsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:21 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2: JSTL, JSF, and SaveProperty
> > Well, you'd be "set"-ing it into one of x scopes :-) > > Yeah, yeah, I guess you're right. I just think it may have the potential > to be a confusing tag if not documented properly. Someone could mistake > it like this: > > <ww:bean name="webwork.util.Counter" name="id"> > <ww:set name="first" value="1"/> > <ww:set name="last" value="5"/> > </ww:bean> > > I know in ww 1.x we use param, but someone could easily mistake it for a > set, which is why I suggested scope. Set works for me, but it has to be > documented well. Make sense? > > rick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
