It depends on the version. In Webwork 2 you can do ServletActionContext.getRequest() (for now, Patrick is going to change those to not be static, so you'd do ServletActionContext.getContext().getRequest()). In Webwork 1.x it says it's deprecated, but it's ok to use.
Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Morten Wilken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > hi all, > i fixed my problem after being inspired by dicks suggestion. > so now my front action sets its own request object, and all > is fine. except: > > what is the right way to get the Request object? > > when i use ActionContext.getContext().getRequest(), i am told > the method is deprecated, but when i look at the wiki it > seems that that is the right way. > > sincerely > morten wilken > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Morten Wilken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:27 PM > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > > hi dick, > > thanks for your answer, now i dont have to worry if i misunderstood > anything > > :-) > > > > perhaps my problem could lead to a feature request instead, > it would > > be > very > > handy to be able to piece together a page using only > <ww:include> tags > > and have them controlled by a front action > > > > (my usecase is that i am building a blog app, and i want to > let users > > skin their own blogs like in roller, and here it would come in very > > handy) > > > > the custom tag you mention should try to map anythying on the > > valuestack (along with the httpRequest) to the action ,if i'm not > > mistaken. > > > > sincerely > > morten wilken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dick Zetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:31 PM > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > > > > Hi Morten, > > That's correct, when you use the action tag it does not try > to map the > > result to any view so what Patrick wrote would not work for > you if you > want > > that. > > > > Concerning the original question about the include and the > parameters > passed > > to it, that is also the correct behaviour. The include is made by > > using > the > > servlet request dispatcher and it passes on the http request.to the > included > > resource. > > If you want to hide the original parameters perhaps you > could create > > your own include tag and in that tag use a > ServletRequestWrapper that > > hides the original parameters? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dick Zetterberg > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Morten Wilken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:10 AM > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > > > > > hi patrick, > > > i did try that, but it doesn't seem to include the > success jsp from > > > the calendar.action > > > > > > i can see that all the right methods get called, but i do not get > > > any > html > > > inserted into my page > > > > > > sincerely > > > morten wilken > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:02 AM > > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > > > > > > > > > > We do a very similar thing... but with the ww:action > tag. Why not > > > > use > > > that? > > > > > > > > -Pat > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You > > could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for > playing. What > > are you waiting for? > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You > > could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for > playing. What > > are you waiting for? > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? > You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. > What are you waiting for? > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-> bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
