Because it doesn't have anything to do with XRoller, and because it uses proprietary technology. Besides, you know I'm not active in opensymphony.
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Patrick Lightbody wrote: > Joe, > Why don't we combine your efforts in to XRoller, which will be a blog/wiki > thing using WebWork2 > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joseph Ottinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:15 AM > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WW in BlogLand > > > > Heh, lots of blogs being written with webwork lately: perhaps we could > > call it "blogwork" to leverage such a common use. > > > > For what it's worth, my blog using webwork, sitemesh, and portalwizard is > > almost done: it's got about 5% of noncritical functionality to finish and > > it'll be deployable. :) > > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Andrew Lombardi wrote: > > > > > For what its worth, I just recently wrote a small blog webapp which is > > > utilizing WebWork 1.3, Hibernate and Sitemesh. Its not at all > > > feature-rich yet, but it can show the latest version and some usage of > > > the different technologies. I'd be open to throwing the code up on > > > sf.net and having everyone hack at it, this could be the putting > > > together of a nice sample app for version 1.3. And if some of you want > > > to contribute on a doc for 1.3, I think this would be invaluable to new > > > WebWork users. > > > > > > Anyways, any thoughts on this? > > > > > > -a > > > > > > Heng Sin Low wrote: > > > > > > >For me, nothing beats a good tutorial and non-trivial sample > application ( with > > > >documentation, of course! ). You see, newbies need some sort of pattern > or best > > > >practise to follow. I think the lack of sample application endorsed by > the > > > >webwork team that demonstrate the pattern and best practise in using > webwork > > > >1.x was one significant issue that holding it back. > > > > > > > >Btw, I notice the current xroller code in cvs is using common-sql > instead of > > > >hibernate, any reason ? I think it will help to promote webwork better > if the > > > >sample application is build with popular library like hibernate. For > e.g, it > > > >shall generate more hit if the sample application is eventually link fr > om the > > > >hibernate site. Also, may be there should be some sort of poll to find > out what > > > >area the sample application should cover to help promote the usage of > webwork2. > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > >Low > > > >--- Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>*Sigh* That is sad. It would be great if someone wanted to help work > on docs. > > > >>For me, I don't have the time and energy to work on 2 versions at the > same > > > >>time, so my energy is going into WW2. I'm going to try to make it well > > > >>documented, to the best of my documentation abilities. This is > especially > > > >>important as Xwork/Webwork 2 is probably conceptually more complex > than > > > >>Webwork 1.x, although it will hopefully be less complex once you get > into it > > > >>because of the lack of annoying little inconsistencies and quirks like > the > > > >>many faces of the ww:property tag. > > > >> > > > >>Oh, and if anyone from O'Reilly is reading, I'd certainly be open to > > > >>contributing to a Webwork book :-) > > > >> > > > >>Jason > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > > >>>From: Anders Engström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:58 AM > > > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>Subject: [OS-webwork] WW in BlogLand > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>http://www.freeroller.net/page/chiara/20030320#webwork_rejecte > > > >>>d_by_my_company > > > >>> > > > >>>Sad, but somewhat true. I guess we need an O'Reilly "WebWork > > > >>>in a Nutshell". IMO WW rocks - but the lack of docs can be > > > >>>frustrating. I know this is a todo for WW2.0 - but 1.3 will > > > >>>be around for a while and need better docs too. > > > >>> > > > >>>I'm currently collecting my experiences with WebWork - and > > > >>>will try to create some documentation from this when time > > > >>>permits. But this won't be enough... so is there an effort to > > > >>>produce quality documentation for 1.3? > > > >>> > > > >>>Something like the docs at http://hibernate.sf.net would make > > > >>>WW sooo much more attractive. > > > >>> > > > >>>Best Regards //Anders > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>-- > > > >>>|===================================| > > > >>>| Anders Engström | > > > >>>| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > > >>>| http://www.gnejs.net | > > > >>>|===================================| > > > >>>|Your mind is like an umbrella. | > > > >>>|It doesn't work unless you open it.| > > > >>>| /Frank Zappa | > > > >>>|===================================| > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > > > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > >>_______________________________________________ > > > >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > > > >Do you Yahoo!? > > > >Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! > > > >http://platinum.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > > >This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > > > >Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > > > >the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > > > >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
