This seems like a very grainular approach for a need that doesn't come up too often. Might just be easier to leave these minor customizations up to the developer. I'd lean towards not doing this...
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "BOGAERT Mathias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Opensymphony-Webwork (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:51 AM Subject: [OS-webwork] Splitting up controlheader > Hi guys, > > In order to facilitate changing the UI tag templates, I suggest we split up > controlheader. A tag will be rendered using: > > - include row-header > - include label-header > - include label > - include label-footer > - include widget-header > - include widget > - include widget-footer > - include row-footer > > This way, if one would like to use for example only CSS templates, only the > header and footers need to be changed. > Does this sound like a good idea? > > Mathias > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
