Or, you could apply the StaticParamInterceptor before ModelDriven and again after ParamInterceptor...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Carreira > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! > > > The ModelDrivenInterceptor could access the ActionContext to > get params and become totally independent of ordering. Just > thought of that.. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! > > > > > > This causes another ModelDriven problem. If the > > StaticParameterInterceptor comes after the > > ParametersInterceptor, then > > how can the proposed ModelDrivenInterceptor utilize static config > > information? > > > > M > > > > Jason Carreira wrote: > > > If you set up your interceptors to have the > > StaticParameterInterceptor > > > AFTER the ParameterInterceptor (which I would suggest is a good > > > practice) then static configuration will override runtime > > parameters. > > > I'm really talking about when you don't pass a method > param (which, > > > with CommandDriven and the "command" param in WW1.x would cause > > > doDefault() to be called) or when you're trying to set it > > at runtime > > > with a method param, either of which allows the user to > > change the URL > > > to change behavior. > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Anthony Eden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:45 PM > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! > > >> > > >> > > >>So you're saying that setting a parameter via the URL and > setting a > > >>parameter via the xwork configuration file call the same > methods. > > >>This sounds like a potential security hole for unsuspecting > > >>developers. > > >> > > >>FWIW, JPublish allows you to pass configuration data to > actions in > > >>the same way that you can with xwork.xml params, but this is a > > different > > >>mechanism than using HTTP parameters. It doesn't call get and set > > >>methods on the action rather there is a predefined method > > >>loadConfiguration(). Not sure whether its better or worse, > > >>just giving > > >>an alternative solution to a similar problem. > > >> > > >>Sincerely, > > >>Anthony Eden > > >> > > >>Jason Carreira wrote: > > >> > > >>>This is how WW1.x command driven actions are implemented. > > >> > > >>What I don't > > >> > > >>>like about this implementation is that anyone who know a > little bit > > >>>about how WW works can twiddle with URLs to call other > > >> > > >>methods. Maybe > > >> > > >>>not a huge risk, but just ugly. > > >>> > > >>>People can choose not to use different methods on their > > >> > > >>actions, but I > > >> > > >>>want the ability to use it to keep from having a > proliferation of > > >>>Action classes. > > >>> > > >>>Jason > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>>From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:17 PM > > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 03:35 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>I find it very useful to have multiple entry points to one > > >>>> > > >>>>Action, so > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>you don't have to have a proliferation of Action classes > > >>>> > > >>>>and they can > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>share common properties and validations... If you don't > > >>>> > > >>>>have this, you > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>end up with people either creating class hierarchies to > > share this > > >>>>>state or passing special parameters to allow a larger > > >>>> > > >>>>grained action > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>to dispatch within itself, like the way ActionSupport did > > >>>> > > >>>>in WW1.x, or > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>they do BOTH. The ability to map aliases to entry point > > methods is > > >>>>>VERY useful for some people, myself included. > > >>>> > > >>>>You extend from ActionSupport generally? Or Action? > > >>>> > > >>>>Just for fun I coded this up: > > >>>> > > >>>>public class DispatchAction implements Action { > > >>>> private String method; > > >>>> > > >>>> final public void setMethod(String method) { > > >>>> this.method = method; > > >>>> } > > >>>> > > >>>> final public String execute() throws Exception { > > >>>> System.out.println("invoke: " + method); > > >>>> > > >>>> return SUCCESS; > > >>>> } > > >>>>} > > >>>> > > >>>>Of course just substitute the right reflection voodoo in > > >>> > > >>execute() to > > >> > > >>>>call whatever method you want. I'd make this abstract, > of course, > > >>>>and that is why I made the two methods final. In xwork.xml I > > >>> > > >>set <param > > >> > > >>>>name="method">someMethod</param> and have the static > interceptor > > >>>>configured. With the dynamic param interceptor also in > the stack > > >>>>I was able to switch the method from ?method=blah too. > > >>>> > > >>>>What is wrong with that approach with how you want things > > to work? > > >>>>Just because of subclassing? > > >>>> > > >>>> Erik "still +1 on Action, with no other entry > points" :) > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > > >>>>including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > >>>>available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX > or Visual > > >>>>Studio .NET. > > >>>>http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06 > > >>> > > >>>1203_01/01 > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > >> > > >>sites including > > >> > > >>>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > >>>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > >>> > > >> > > >>http://aspnet.click-> > > > > > > url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/ > > > > > >>>01 > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>------------------------------------------------------- > > >>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > > >>including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > >>available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > > >>Studio .NET. > > >>http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06 > > > > > > 1203_01/01 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > sites including > > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > > > > http://aspnet.click-> > url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/ > > > 01 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > > Visual Studio .NET. > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06 > 1203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06 1203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
