I actually did implement this, Pat... It's in there. :-) You don't think it's a good idea to use the ValueStack to set properties from params?
Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ParametersInterceptor behaviour on > a ModelDriver action > > > Marco, > There have been a couple requests to implement > ValueStack.set() (we currently don't, look at > CompountRootAccessor to see for yourself). If you open a jira > issue, we'll try to get around to it shortly. > > With regards to your example, if you need to set both the > model and the action, it sounds like ModelDriven isn't really > what you need. > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marco Papini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:48 AM > Subject: [OS-webwork] ParametersInterceptor behaviour on a > ModelDriver action > > > > Another thought on ModelDriven action. > > Consider this use case: > > > > public class Model { > > String field = null; > > public String getField() { return this.field; } > > public void setField(String field) { this.field = field; } } > > > > public class ModelDrivenAction > > extends ActionSupport > > implements ModelDriven { > > > > String actionField = null; > > public String getActionField() { return this.actionField; } > > public void setActionField(String actionField) { > this.actionField > > = actionField; } > > > > Model model = new Model(); > > public Object getModel() { return this.model; } > > > > } > > > > The actionField action property is never set, because the > > ParametersInterceptor just set the model properties if an > action is a > > ModelDriven. Is this the supposed behaviour ? I think that's much > > better to make the ParametersInterceptor work directly on the value > > stack, so it can set the model properties and, if a property isn't > > found, go down the stack looking for a suitable property in the > > action. > > > > Any comments ? > > > > Marco > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet > _072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
