In the same way that we're going to have a Pico integration for IoC, I'd like to have a Spring integration for IoC... But these need to be in an add-on project for integrating other dependencies with Xwork / WebWork outside of the main code base.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC? > > > What is the planned intergration with Spring? > > > Cheers, > matthew > > > > > On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 08:57 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: > > > I think we need to get the project for external > integrations going. I > > got a note from Rod Johnson about this too, and I think it > would be a > > great idea to have integrations with Spring and Picocontainer, but > > these > > need to be in a separate project. We're explicitly limiting > > dependencies > > in Xwork / WebWork as much as possible. > > > > Jason > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rob Rudin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:39 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC? > >> > >> > >> Not to sound like a broken record, but I think Spring does > a nice job > >> of handling Hibernate. It provides a Hibernate template to > handle the > >> Hibernate plumbing and nice support for configuring a > SessionFactory. > >> Should be very easy to hook this into WW2's IoC. > >> > >> Rob > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Matthew E. Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:38 PM > >> Subject: [OS-webwork] Is This a Bad Use of IoC? > >> > >> > >>> I think I may be going Inversion of Control mad lately and > >> need some > >>> help sorting out if what I am doing is just wrong. I am > building a > >>> new persistence manager where the core manager is based upon > >>> hibernate. The hibernate manager needs three different > >> providers- one > >>> for Configuration, one for SessionFactory, and one for > >> Sessions. Each > >>> of these providers (Conf, SF, and Session) can have different > >>> implementations. For example, the default Session > provider always > >>> returns a new session; however, there is also a > ThreadLocal version > >>> which returns the same session for the entire thread. > >>> > >>> The question I have is how do I specify and load these at > runtime? > >>> The most obvious answer is to have a custom xml file that > specifies > >>> which provider fulfills each role. I could write (and > already have > >>> done so) a loader to read an XML file and configure the > >> system. But, > >>> instead of having this in a separate file, would it be a complete > >>> bastardization of the intention of IoC (XWork edition) to > use it to > >>> automatically configure the providers? > >>> > >>> Why does this seem bad? Because the primary intention of > IoC is to > >>> wire business components whereas these providers will > >> probably never > >>> be used outside the real component, the persistence > >> manager. Instead, > >>> it seems like I am too lazy to write a loader to configure > >> the system. > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> matthew > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > >> sites including > >>> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > >>> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > >>> > >> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet > >> _072303_01/01 > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > >> including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums > are available > >> now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > >> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet > > _072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/ > > direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
