Please send them to me (as 2 separate messages)... We'll see if our exchange server can handle the load :-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2? > > > I've created two sample applications that show the > performance difference. The problem is that I have two zip > files, one for each project (Eclipse/MyEclipse project) and > they're each over 5MB (because of supporting jars). That > means I can't attach them to a Jira issue. I'd like to send > them out so you can see what I'm talking about. > > Basically, the sample apps each do exactly the same thing but > one uses ww1 and the other xwork/ww2. A simple "company" > object is loaded up and the page is filled using the custom > "pageset" construct I've created. It's a cached configuration > object that says how a page should be laid out (it's > something I use to help codify common page design, so I don't > have to screw around with html/jsp/velocity or what have you > for pages that all follow the same layout pattern). I realize > that this pageset thing is unusual but it's not the problem, > since it renders fine with ww1. The sample apps don't do any > database calls, so it's obvious that the performance hit > comes somewhere in the render cycle. > > What I'm seeing, consistently, on the same server, is the following: > ww1: 10-20ms load > ww2: 190-250ms load > > That's a pretty big difference, and again, these pages aren't > doing anything special or any database calls. I'm guessing > that part of it is in how velocity is being used, or perhaps > something to do with searching the ognl stack (since the > stack is used for things like getting object properties or > creating instances of utility classes). > > One other thing: the copy of the webwork2 jar I'm using has > been modified to add a "$webwork" utility class to the > velocity stack on a request. This copies the way things were > done in ww1. of course, my fumbling around with this in ww2 > may have caused the performance hit. I can supply the > modifications upon request. They're also in a current JIRA > issue as attachments, at issue # WW251. > > Please let me know how I can get the sample projects to > anyone who's interested. I think this simple example would go > a long way towards understanding how to optimize ww2. > > Thanks, > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Drew McAuliffe > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2? > > > I've moved from Tomcat to oc4j and the numbers have improved > considerably. So at this point, it's not a complete hassle > like it was before. Though now I'm interested to see how fast > the old version would have worked on oc4j. > > The results I was getting were consistent across both Tomcat > 4.1.x and 5.0. It seems to happen with the render cycle, as I > said. I haven't had time to profile it but I'll get on it > this week. I have a feeling, and this is just a guess, that > it might have something to do with the similarity between > ognl and velocity syntax? I'm not sure but I should have some > sort of information soon. > > One of the other things I'm going to try to do is use the ww2 > tags to duplicate some of what I'm doing in velocity macros > now. I'll try to replace my usage of macros with component > tags and see how it works out. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or > Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet _072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
