Did you write unit tests for it? :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Cameron Braid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2- Improving ServletRedirectResult > > > I've comitted this code into HEAD at java.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Cameron Braid > Sent: Friday, 29 August 2003 10:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2- Improving ServletRedirectResult > > > I am currently working on a patch for the RedirectResult that > appends the namespace and servlet context for relative redirects. > > This means that your example below, you can use > > <result name="success" type="redirect"> > <param name="location">edit.action</param> > </result> > > And it will execute response.sendRedirect("/gadget/edit.action")) > > It also does response URL encoding for URL rewrite based > session tracking (no cookies) > > Cameron. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Rene Gielen > Sent: Friday, 29 August 2003 4:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] WW2- Improving ServletRedirectResult > > > Hi, > > we needed some more sophisticated redirection handling and I > implemented it, > based on ServletRedirectResult / ActionChainResult. I was > asking if we are > alone with our need for it. If not (say HERE loud and clearly > :-), I will > send it over... > > In our application we have lots of edit->store->edit or > edit->delete->overview > action chains for various business entities. But there is a > little problem > with the chain result type, because when store.action chains > go edit.action > on succes, the current URL remains xyz/store.action. Not very > pleasant for > the lovers of browers reload / back button... > > Alternative is to use a redirection, and, of course, there is > a suitable > > result type redirect, but... it only takes complete http location as > arguments and knows nothing about actions and namespaces. So > if you define a > package with its own namespace, say one namespace for each > business entity, > having nearly almost an edit, store, delete and overview action per > namespace, it would be nice to configure the redirection just > like you do > when using chain. > > So I implemented action handling for redirect result type > triggered by the new > parameter actionName, analog to the chain result type. When > the actionName > parameter is given, the namespace will be resolved (if > staying in local > namespace), and .action is appended to construct a valid url > for redirection. > If instead the old location parameter is set, nothing changes > to former > handling of redirection. To give an example: > > <package name="gadget" extends="default" namespace="/gadget"> > > <action name="edit" class="de.aixcept.foo.GadgetActions" > method="edit"> > <result name="success" type="dispatcher"> > <param name="location">/WEB-INF/jsp/gadget/edit.jsp</param> > </result> > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > </action> > > <action name="store" class="de.aixcept.foo.GadgetActions" > method="store"> > <result name="error" type="dispatcher"> > <param name="location">/WEB-INF/jsp/gadget/edit.jsp</param> > </result> > <!-- Redirect to edit ection in same namespace on success --> > <result name="success" type="redirect"> > <param name="actionName">edit</param> > </result> > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > </action> > > <action name="lookup" class="de.aixcept.foo.GadgetActions" > method="lookup"> > <result name="success" type="redirect"> > <param > name="location">http://www.gadgetfarm.org/lookup/</param> > </result> > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > </action> > > </package> > > Anybody else needing it? > > Regards, > - Rene > > -- > Rene Gielen | http://www.aixcept.de/ > Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A > Germany | gielen at aixcept.de > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
