On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:57:57AM -0700, Pat Lightbody wrote: > Anders, > WebWork was meant, from the start, to include optional components. It was > built to be an extension upon XWork to include various view support. If we > made FreeMarker a view technology that ended up in webwork-extensions, why > wouldn't velocity, JSP, XSLT, and JasperReports go there too? > Webwork-extensions should be for stuff that is optional to WebWork... > > So in short: > Views are optional to XWork, but core to WebWork > Stuff like IoC are optional to WebWork, but core to WebWork-extensions. > > Make sense? >
Thanks for the perspective... I'm probably looking through the "ww1.3" lens because I totally ignored the fact that webwork is an extension of xwork :) So - yes, it makes perfect sense :) //Anders -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anders Engström [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.gnejs.net PGP-Key: ED010E7F . [Your mind is like an umbrella. It doesn't work unless you open it.]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
