I agree... Just busy right at the moment... The DTD is out there on the wiki if anyone wants to take a few minutes and add the necessary detail...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Order of elements in xwork.xml > > > Great! > But for those who don't read or understand the DTD the correct order > should be mentioned in the docs. > > /Jonas > > Jason Carreira wrote: > > I've added the DTD to the Wiki... I think they need to remain > > constrained for the reason you mentioned... We only want > one block of > > Interceptor declarations, etc... > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:36 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Order of elements in xwork.xml > >> > >> > >>Ok, in this case they are constrained to the specific order > >>made in the > >>dtd. Either this has to get into the docs (easy solution) or > >>the dtd may > >> be changed to allow any order (which I think also leads to > >>changes in > >>the XmlConfigurationProvider; it's supposed all elements but > >>action are > >>singletons) > >> > >>/Jonas > >> > >>James Cook wrote: > >> > >>>Yes, the order of, not related, elements is constrained in XML. > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>The problem was that the order of these elements was not > >> > >>the same as > >> > >>>in > >>>the error message above. Is this how it should be? (I don't > >> > >>know very > >> > >>>much about xml and parsing but it seems pretty stupid if > >> > >>the order of, > >> > >>>not related, elements is constrained) > >>> > >>>/Jonas > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
