does the CoolUriDispatcher handle passing arrays like when using multiple checkboxes or multiple selected select tags?

also whats going to happen if you have a textfield that its value is "03/17/1990"

also I think a CoolUrlTag would make sense to have aswell to write out the Urls just like <ww:url> does now but in the new Cool format

Jérôme BERNARD wrote:
Hi Cameron,

The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more I think it is too
much limited. For example I changed the abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .

Why?

Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:

public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport { long articleID;
Article article;
// getter & setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}


If you use a parameter named "article" (by using the same parameter name as the
one from the action) then you will need to use weird method names in order to
retreive the real object linked to this id.

Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher that reads advanced
mapping configuration from another xml file (or perhaps extends webwork.xml?).

This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but also deal with URL
including dates (like http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).

What do you think about this?

Jérôme.

Selon Cameron Braid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


I have madea  patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for extensability
:

the methods that can be overriden are

protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getApplicationMap()
protected String getActionName(HttpServletRequest request)
protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)

this will allow for the core logic in the service method to be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.


Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?

If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?



Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-) Jérôme.

Cameron Braid wrote:


What IDE do you use ?

Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,

which makes


tasks like that a piece of cake.

Cam




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?



Cameron Braid wrote:





Cool idea :)

Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better



to use the



wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)




Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override so many methods :-(


I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.

Jérôme.




Cam






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?


I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends ServletDispatcher
and provides such a functionality. I also provided a way to shorten even more the URL by assuming that if the first parameter name is not specified then it is supposed to be the name of the action.


This allows to replace the following URL http://myhost.com/article/article/123
with this URL http://myhost.com/article/123.


Any code review welcomed! :-p

Jérôme.

Robert Douglass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:






I think this is the relevant code, from org.apache.turbine.util.parser.DefaultParameterParser. As I





understand





it, Turbine folks avoid URLs like foo/bar?id=1812 in favor of foo/bar/id/1812. I've never used this, and I can't remember





right off





exactly how the servlet container knows which part is the





path info,





but essentially, they assume that the path info follows

the pattern


name_1/value_1/...name_n/value_n. The advantage is

supposed to be


search-engine friendly URLs from completely dynamic





applications. This





gets touted by the Turbine community as a great feature

(and it may


be). I'd love to have this available, but as you can see





below, it is





easy enough to implement that anyone can do it as soon

as they want


it. I don't really need it at the moment, so I'll let





someone else do





it.

-Robert

// Also cache any pathinfo variables that are passed around as
// if they are query string data.
try
{
StringTokenizer st =
new



StringTokenizer(request.getPathInfo(), "/");



boolean isNameTok = true;
String pathPart = null;
while (st.hasMoreTokens())
{
if (isNameTok)
{
tmp =





java.net.URLDecoder.decode(st.nextToken());





isNameTok = false;
}
else
{
pathPart =





java.net.URLDecoder.decode(st.nextToken());





if (tmp.length() > 0)
{
add(convert(tmp), pathPart); //R.D.





this add





the params to their internal param implementation, see below*
}
isNameTok = true;
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// If anything goes wrong above, don't worry about it.
// Chances are that the path info was wrong

anyways and


// things that depend on it being right will

fail later


         // and should be caught later.
     }


* from super-class BaseValueParser
/**
* Random access storage for parameter data. The keys





must always be





  * Strings.  The values will be arrays of Strings.
  */
 private Map parameters = new HashMap();

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Behalf Of





Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?


Could you give some insights about the way Turbine

handle URLs? Any


pointers?

Jérôme.





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork






------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork








------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to