I looked at the way 1.3 did it and I'm going to do the same thing -- 
escaping is always off unless specifically turned on.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "boxed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Escaping


> Pat Lightbody wrote:
>
> >That was a typo  -- I'd only escape things that didn't have bodies to
avoid
> >that very confusion. What say you?
> >
> >
> >
> That sounds fine, although I'm not too keen on the always escape thing
> since I won't use it myself. I have my own tranformations I want to do
> that are a bit more complex than the standard HTML escaping, or I don't
> do any. An option to turn it off per component is probably a better idea
> than globally if components are to live together peacefully.
>
> With those two caveats: +1 :P
>
> Anders Hovmöller
>
> >>Pat Lightbody wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which
> >>>all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some
> >>>want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am
> >>>leaning towards this:
> >>>
> >>>* UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc should all _escape_ by default
> >>>* URL tag should NOT escape by default
> >>>* All tags should have an escape attribute (true/false)
> >>>* Possibly have global params in webwork.properties to override the
> >>>two defaults (UI & URL)
> >>>
> >>>What do you guys think?
> >>>
> >>>-Pat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I think there is some mistake here. The property tag AND the iterate
> >>tags can't escape. That will create the following issue:
> >>
> >><ww:iterate value="foo">
> >>  this is escaped
> >>  <ww:property value="thisPropertyIsEscapedTwice"/>
> >></ww:iterate>
> >>
> >>etcetc. It seems that either you haven't thought this through or you put
> >>it strangely. +1 on all tags having escape attribute though. I do think
> >>that it might be an issue that there's really two kinds of escaping:
> >>escaping the body of the tag and escaping the text the tag prints. This
> >>is rather confusing, and unwanted.
> >>
> >>Anders Hovmöller
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to