Pat Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Jerome,
> I think that at this point it's a nice feature but we probably won't have
> the time to get this in 2.0. I'd like for all the developers to focus on
> getting 2.0 out the door with 1.3 compatibility and all the open bugs
> resolved.

Pat,

I agree with you. This features has not been 'explored' enough yet to be
included in the 2.0 release. But even though this feature is not going to be
included in WW 2.0, I think the discussion could go on. Before coding a lot of
stuff, I'd like to have some advises, especially from you the WW gurus :-)

For example some questions are still open: should we write the mapping
definitions with xwork.xml, or should the CoorURIServletDispatcher use another
configuration file... What should the format of the mapping definitions be, etc etc.

Jérôme.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to