Pat Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jerome, > I think that at this point it's a nice feature but we probably won't have > the time to get this in 2.0. I'd like for all the developers to focus on > getting 2.0 out the door with 1.3 compatibility and all the open bugs > resolved.
Pat, I agree with you. This features has not been 'explored' enough yet to be included in the 2.0 release. But even though this feature is not going to be included in WW 2.0, I think the discussion could go on. Before coding a lot of stuff, I'd like to have some advises, especially from you the WW gurus :-) For example some questions are still open: should we write the mapping definitions with xwork.xml, or should the CoorURIServletDispatcher use another configuration file... What should the format of the mapping definitions be, etc etc. Jérôme. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork