Agreed! We already backported support for having views be parsed to do
"view.jsp?id=${id}". Any others we can do?-Pat -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hani Suleiman Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Change in exception handling suggestion Of course, this cuts both ways, I'd welcome (nay, encourage!) submissions for patches that port 2.x features back into 1.x On Nov 4, 2003, at 11:36 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote: > PS: I'm against adding features to the 1.x codeline that the 2.x > codeline "won't need" -- that just makes the migration that much > trickier. At this point, anything added to 1.x should be added to 2.x, > unless of course it already exists in 2.x > > -Pat > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joseph Ottinger > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Change in exception handling suggestion > > I've still been mulling this over, despite the humour here, and I still > think that this exception handling thing is a Good Idea. > > WW2/XW wouldn't need it, because the interceptors presumably would > serve > the same role, but WW1 users tend to have a certain, very similar > approach > to handling this kind of thing, and the tendency for similar approaches > is > why I think the framework *should* standardize it. So far, I, Mr. Cook, > and a few WW converts here use the same kind of solution (arrived at > independently, as far as I know); any others? What other kinds of > patterns > are used for this kind of thing, outside of letting it bubble up to the > caller? > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Hani Suleiman wrote: > >> ExceptionAware! >> >> Chris Nokleberg wrote: >> >>> Joseph Ottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>>> What I'd thought of was adding an extra method to Action and >>>> ActionSupport. The Action method's signature might look like this: >>>> >>>> public String handleException(Throwable t) throws Throwable; >>>> >>>> The ActionSupport implementation: >>>> >>>> public String handleException(Throwable t) throws Throwable { >>>> throw t; >>>> } >>> >>> >>> I like it, but I would make it an interface: >>> public interface ExceptionHandler extends Action { >>> String handleException(Throwable t); >>> } >>> >>> and then have an interceptor which will catch the exception and do > the right >>> thing if the action instanceof ExceptionHandler. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >>> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >>> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >>> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com > IT Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] > J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
