This was a part of the big UI tag refactoring (to make them work without having come through an Action and to allow them to work with Sitemesh). If you've found some of our tags which don't use the new method, and still use the ActionContext, then please file a Jira and we'll get them cleaned up.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick N. Brier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ValueStack being unexpectedly replaced > > > Ok. Answered my own question, but should the > TagUtils.getStack() check > for an existing value stack in an existing ActionContext > before creating > one (which is, of course, empty)? > > Turns out that the Webwork2 Tags extend WebWorkTagSupport and > WebWorkBodyTagSupport and utilize an accessor that calls the > TagUtils.getStack() method. My custom tags extended > TagSupport/BodyTagSupport and were attempting to access the > value stack > via the ActionContext. The WW2 PropertyTag was using the > TagUtils.getStack() which if the property > "webwork.valueStack" is not in > the request attributes will create one. Another one of my > tags used the > UrlHelper.buildUrl() method which accesses the valueStack from the > ActionContext. > > So there seems to be some inconsistency in terms of where you get a > value stack. Am I missing a concept here or is this worth > discussing? > Thank you. > > Fred. > > Frederick N. Brier wrote: > > > Why would the value stack object change between tags in the > same JSP? > > I am calling: ActionContext.getContext().getValueStack() in several > > tags. I print out the value each time: > > > > 1st tag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 2nd tag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 3rd tag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The tag classes extend the standard TagSupport. The 3rd > tag is the > > Webwork2 PropertyTag (I stuck a Log INFO statement in it and > > rebuild). I have looked at the generated JSP source, but it is not > > apparent where this could be happening. Any thoughts as to > how this > > could happen? Thank you. > > > > Fred. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
