Please make sure that the PushTag uses the same interface (or even better, code) that 2.0 uses.
-Pat -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dick Zetterberg Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3 Hi there, I would like to add a push tag to the 1.3 branch and I just want to check that there are no objections to this. Why do I want to add it when we can do the same with the property tag already? Because the property tag is inefficient when used for this purpose. This is because it evaluates the body, so a new bodyContent will be created by the container, which means that the data inside the property tag has to be shuffled around in the bodyContents, which is inefficient. The property tag would not be changed so it would not break compatibility. Any objections to this? Cheers, Dick Zetterberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
