I was talking to Ara about this very thing just a bit ago. Sounds like
some sort of regression (we'll need a unit test for this). Please open a
bug and I'll get on it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fred Lamuette
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] No object in the CompoundRoot has a property
named 'profiling'

I was very surprised (actually annoyed) of that new behavior, above all
when
I needed to add useless setter methods to fit to the the latest Xwork/WW
cvs
snapshot. I really think it's a little bit tedious, the new behavior
keeps
almost the role of a testing framework.
Richard.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
BOGAERT Mathias
Envoyé : mardi 6 janvier 2004 13:07
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [OS-webwork] No object in the CompoundRoot has a property named
'profiling'


Hi,

Since the latest Xwork/WebWork from CVS, my application throws the
following
exception when adding a request parameter that doesn't have a setter
(property) for it. I use several parameters to control my servlet
filters;
so this is a blocking bug for me.

java.lang.RuntimeException: No object in the CompoundRoot has a property
named 'profiling'.
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.util.CompoundRootAccessor.setProperty(CompoundRoo
tAcc
essor.java:63)
        at ognl.OgnlRuntime.setProperty(OgnlRuntime.java:1460)
        at ognl.ASTProperty.setValueBody(ASTProperty.java:105)
        at ognl.SimpleNode.setValue(SimpleNode.java:215)
        at ognl.Ognl.setValue(Ognl.java:478)
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.util.OgnlValueStack.setValue(OgnlValueStack.java:
75)
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor.before(Paramete
rsIn
terceptor.java:47)
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept(AroundInt
erce
ptor.java:36)
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultActionInvoc
atio
n.java:170)
        at
com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept(AroundInt
erce
ptor.java:37)

Can this be considered an issue? Bug? Feature?

Thanks,
Mathias


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for
IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys
admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for
IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys
admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=ick
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to