remigijus wrote:
Ok it sounds nice, I'm not against velocity, I'm just curious.
How many hits you are getting per day and peak load?
What hardware and software do you use?

We do load tests sometimes, but it's hard to compare that with reality.


In reality, we do have one web hotel server which currently hosts 57 customers, and with a total of 14.600 (dynamic) pages. I'd guess about 10 of those are so-called high-volume sites. We have no HTML output caching, so if Velocity didn't perform the server would crash. This is currently a 3Ghz/1.5Gb/Linux box, with Apache/JBoss/Tomcat as infrastructure and our CMS running inside of that. For the next version we're switching to Apache/Tomcat only.

Did you tryed to look at Freemarker, how can you compare Freemarker vs
Velocity.

I got allergic to Jonathans "Freemarker rules"-rants early on, and hence never bothered with it.


Velocity *is* limited. Which is why it fits our purposes perfectly. YMMV.

/Rickard




------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to