On Tuesday 20 March 2007 00:33, Tim Brown wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 15:16, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 March 2007 00:40, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> > > Please speak up if you offer help (coding, testing, sponsoring
> > > coders, ...). The intitial tasks I see so far are:
> > >
> > > - sync openvas-libraries with nessus-libraries
> >
> > I've analysed the changes (sort of).
> > My guess is that it will be more consistent to patch the openvas-libraries
> > to be nessus-libraries 2.2.8 and start again. Or even remove the whole
> > stuff and commit a clean nessus-libraries 2.2.8. Then there is clean
> > point to start and from where all changes are cleanly trackable.
> > Actually same for libnasl. But not for the other modules.
>
> This seems reasonable, but are you prosing to take Tenable's version or the
> code from debian.org?
good point. Do you expect a major difference?
However, I do not see this as a technical problem. The Debian patches,
if sensible, could be integrated easily.
So, anyone not OK with removing current contents of openvas-libraries
and openvas-libnasl with the current corresponding nessus modules?
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück
Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-devel mailing list
Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
