On Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2007, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> IMHO we are ready to get out OpenVAS release 0.9.0 :-)
>
> The migration from OpenSSL to GNUTLS was successful.
>
> I tested the whole stuff via OpenVAS-Client and it basically
> worked.
>
> Likely there are some problems here and there, but after
> all it makes sense to start broadening the test users base
> _now_.
>
> If generally agreed, I can start releasing the modules
> "openvas-libraries 0.9.0", "openvas-libnasl 0.9.0",
> "openvas-server 0.9.0" and "openvas-plugins 0.9.0".
> For the latter, there is still a license issue which I send
> to openvas-discuss in hope for clarification. We should
> release openvas-plugins only once the issue has been resolved.
>
> As usual: Comments? Suggestions? Go for it?
at least it seem no one disagrees ;-)
After some long thoughts about versioning all openvas
modules jointly or separately (there was a thread
about it in Marc 2007) I came to the conclusion that
it is of more advantage to have separate versioning.
Norm's points are valid. But after all I think the other
problems weight even more.
I'd really like to try out inedependent versioning.
If it leads to too much trouble after all we can return
to a joint versioning.
However, as a matter of fact we'll start with the
same version anyway ;-)
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück
Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
