On Feb 19, 2008 7:35 PM, Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 20 February 2008 00:08:24 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4, > > listed here: > > http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html > > > > Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of them :-) > > However, please read and judge whether it is a good > > or bad idea or wether it needs further refinement. > > > > I am not totally sure about the proper voting scheme. > > Tim, Robert: Does SPI require something special or > > do we just decide upon a simple voting? > > The full details as we expressed them in the constitution can be found at > http://seedsforchange.org.uk/free/consens, but it essentially comes down to a > show of negative hands. If noone raises strong objections against an idea > then we can proceed. One thing that isn't defined is the period in which > people need to respond in order for an objection to be considered. In the > past I've seen people work on the 24 hour rule, but since we're spread across > multiple continents and time zones, I'd propose a longer period. OTOH we > can't have an indefinite period of time. How about 48 hours with an > gentlemens agreement not to start a call for voting over weekends. >
48 Hours sounds good to me. We should be able to make exceptions to the rule if someone has given advanced notice of not being available for a certain time period as well. -RB -- Robert Berkowitz 919.244.5704 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
