All, I got the following rejection:
> unfortunately there seems to be copyright and licensing > information missing (and a problem as well) that make > this packages still a candidate for REJECTion: > - one of the files has a 4-clause-BSD as a license, > that is GPL-incompatible (= BAD for our purposes). > - you are missing a copyright notice at least for the > Regents of the U of Califonia. These both relate to nasl/lfind.c. Looking around, sudo at least has the same code under the 3 clause variation of the BSD license. I am going to replace ours with theirs. > - for "see PKT_LICENSE for the license details" in the > header you should at least explain that we do not > ship the file and reproduce (or point to if it's > a common one) the license. Does anyone have a copy of this file? We appear to have lost it. > On a minor note, it would be good if you could indicate > that the OpenSSL-exception does not apply to all packages > more clearly (e.g. by writing something to this end just > above it and indenting). I will make this change. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Brown <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/> _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
