On Montag, 1. September 2008, Vlatko Kosturjak wrote:
> >> Any concerns with doing this big step _now_?
> >> Alternatives?
> > none came in so far :-)
> >
> > So, I will start as proposed.
> > For a while it will be quite easy to roll-back commits in case
> > another strategy is prefered.
>
> As long as you have branched/tagged stable version of OpenVAS,
> but currently I see only openvas-client and openvas-server branch.
> You won't modify anything else? even not openvas-libraries?
yes, only openvas-server and openvas-client are branched for stable
development so far.
As soon as it turns out necessary, I plan to branch the other modules
as well. It will be only necessary upon compatibility breaking or risk
of instability.
Didn't saw a reason to do this earlier than necessary ...
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück
Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-devel mailing list
Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
