On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stjepan Gros wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Vlatko Kosturjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Well, actually I do. What about those patches to move plugins into
>>>> separate subdirectory?
>>> Didn't take a deeper look at the patch. I'm concerned about issue I see;
>>> I'm not sure how include files will be handled?
>> Can you elaborate a bit more?
>> Anyway, it seems that latest changes in trunk cause conflicts with the
>> patch I sent so I'll have to do that again. But this time I'll wait
>> until trunk is open for new changes.
>
> http_trace.nasl check, for example, includes the following inc file
> through following directive:
> include("http_func.inc");This is already handled in the patch. Two include paths are implicitly defined for each nasl script that is opened: 1. the directory where nasl file itself is placed 2. the main directory from which recursive descent started Added to that are all include directories specified in configuration file, if any. I think that in that way there will be no problems with existing scripts/setups. Stjepan _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
