Am Montag 22 Dezember 2008 schrieb Michael Wiegand: > Could you explain why you are passing LDFLAGS directly to gcc? This may > work in some or most cases, but might lead to trouble with LDFLAGS gcc > does not understand. Wouldn't it be better to use -Xlinker or -Wl, for > that?
It's common practise to do so. If you pass LDFLAGS to configure/makefiles, you usually pass them in a gcc-compliant way. That's also the way common autoconf/automake-setups do it, you'll always use something like LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" and never LDFLAGS="--as-needed". -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: ha...@hboeck.de http://www.jukss.de/ Jugemdumweltkongress, 27.12.-4.1.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
