> * ssl_ciphers - SSL implementation missing, basic SSLv2 implementation > in ssl_funcs.inc, but for this we need SSLv2 and SSLv3 implementation. > Should we implement SSL in NASL or use openssl/gnutls and export useful > f() to NASL?
We should export useful information back to NASL via functions. We really do not want to be implementing SSL in NASL. In this case, perhaps a single function "get_ssl_ciphers(PROT, port)" might be an API that does all the work that the plugin used to do, but in the context of an API that can be invoked from a NASL script, rather than structured as a C plugin. Thomas _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
