Hello, On Montag, 5. Oktober 2009, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > according to our retirement procedure > http://www.openvas.org/release-life-cycle.html > > I would like to starte the retirement of 1.0 around Oct 15th > so that the final end of life is mid of January. > The pre-condition is met (2.0 available since Dec. 2008) > and I volunteer to be the retirement coordinator. > > Are there any concerns from the developer side about > the retirement of 1.0. > > 1.0 is part of some distributions that continue to have it > as "stable". Does this cause any implications? > (OpenVAS is surely not the only product that has > end-of-life-dates no matching the ones if distributions). > > The advantage of retirering 1.0 is that we can use some 2.0 > features for NASL scripts in the feed.
got no feedback on this, so I will start the retirement process today with the announcement on openvas-announce. Best Jan -- Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460 Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel