I've been seriously torn on this one, as to whether to abstain or not. With tests without CVEs, the mapping of risk level to a static CVSS value without consideration of the scoring algorithm that is used for true CVSS calculation introduces an inconsistency that would call into question the true value of the CVSS scores within nasl scripts.
Regrettably, I vote -1. Thomas Chandrashekhar B wrote: > +1 > > Chandra. > > -----Original Message----- > From: openvas-devel-boun...@wald.intevation.org > [mailto:openvas-devel-boun...@wald.intevation.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Oliver > Wagner > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 4:12 AM > To: openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org > Subject: [Openvas-devel] Call for vote: CR58: NVT Feed CVSS consolidation > > Hello, > > I'd like to call for a vote on Change Request #58 (NVT Feed CVSS > consolidation): http://www.openvas.org/openvas-cr-58.html > > My vote is +1. > > All the best > > Jan > > -- > Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ > Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR > B 202460 > Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-devel mailing list > Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org > http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-devel mailing list > Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org > http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel > _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
