I can't imagine everyone is having the SIGSEGV error, right? Are there tests I should be avoiding?
I've rebuilt my entire test system again using Fedora 9 and the unofficial repository listed in the instructions. I can't seem to run a single test on a single host without a SIGSEGV appearing at the end of the openvas log. If it matters, running a test with no port scanner and no plugins completes without the error (although it's a rather useless test). On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Patrick Hornung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >>> >>> > Also, I created an OpenVAS server on a very bare install of fedora 9 in >>> > vmware, but my scans only seem to do port scans and it never makes it >>> to the >>> > vulnerability scan part. Is there something obvious that I'm missing? >>> >>> maybe you have configured openvasd with "nasl-no-signature-checks=no" >>> but not configured signatures and/or not configured the OpenVAS NVT feed? >>> >>> >> I was using everything as it came from the rpm available, but I'll >> certainly check this out. >> >> Thanks for the tips. My timeline for a release of the VM is early >> September, so I'll definitely keep you informed on how it's going. >> >> > I have some more information on the problem I'm having, it seems that I'm > getting SIGSEGV errors in my openvasd log. Here's an example of a scan of 4 > hosts on my local network. I'm running the server with the following > command: OpenVAS-Client -T html_graph localhost 1241 test test /root/file > test3 > I'm running the command line client from the server, the server runs the > command on port 1241, my username and password are both 'test' while I > troubleshoot, the file /root/file contains these hosts, and test3 is the > directory I'm writing the results to. > > As a test, I've rebuilt everything on debian now using subversion this time > for everything but the client, which I compiled from 1.0.4 using the > --disable-gtk as referenced in a prior issue. Based on that, it seems I'm > making the same mistake again... > > Is there anything else I can do to troubleshoot this? > > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:10 2008][2604] user test starts a new scan. Target(s) : > 10.0.0.109,10.0.0.110,10.0.0.189,10.0.0.218, with max_hosts = 5 and > max_checks = 4 > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:10 2008][2604] user test : testing 10.0.0.109 ( > 10.0.0.109) [2605] > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:11 2008][2604] user test : testing 10.0.0.110 ( > 10.0.0.110) [2606] > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:11 2008][2604] user test : testing 10.0.0.189 ( > 10.0.0.189) [2607] > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:11 2008][2604] user test : testing 10.0.0.218 ( > 10.0.0.218) [2608] > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:11 2008][2527] connection from 10.0.0.109 > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:17 2008][2527] connection from 10.0.0.109 > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:17 2008][2605] SIGSEGV occured ! > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:17 2008][2527] connection from 10.0.0.109 > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:18 2008][2608] SIGSEGV occured ! > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:18 2008][2606] SIGSEGV occured ! > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:36 2008][2607] SIGSEGV occured ! > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:36 2008][2604] user test : test complete > [Fri Aug 8 16:49:36 2008][2604] SIGSEGV occured ! > > >
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
