On Mittwoch, 28. April 2010, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> I'm just wondering why there are only "user" and "administrator" roles,
> but no "auditor" or "reviewer" role. This would be handy for giving
> acces to people who should only *view* settings or results, but not be
> allowed managing anything.
>
> Are there any plans to implement such a role?
I had a "observer" role in mind.
Another role could be "dashboard".
In any case it would a user who has only read access.
The problem is: Should this role have the power to decide
on his own which tasks of which users to review
or should the users allow access for their tasks to the observer role?
I postponed my own thoughts until we have a master/slave
feature for a networked set of Scan Engines, because this
maybe requires other roles as well.
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/
Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B
202460
Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
