Thanks for your help!

I suppose that leads to my next question then. I need to be able to find a way of emailing only when new ports are discovered as open. Something I noticed is the "Risk Factor" of the Nmap (NASL Wrapper) scanner says it has a Risk of "High", yet when it discovers new ports they are placed as either Log or Low threat level. I think I may be misunderstanding what the Risk column represents in the Scan Config.

If I could get the ports that OpenVAS to actually be something higher than Log or Low, I could possibly override them to be Low after I have verified they are fine, and that would have the added benefit of making the Threat Level increase, and kicking off an email.

  • What does the Risk column mean in the "Scan Config Family Details"? I see in the help it says "Shows the risk factor of a NVT. Any NVT has a value." I would expect that to mean then when something is detected as problem under that NVT it would carry a "High" threat level, yet that doesn't seem to be the case.
  • Is there a way of increasing all ports that are discovered as open from Log/Low to be Medium or higher for Nmap? I've been all through GSA and haven't been able to find a way of doing that.


Thanks again for your help!





On 5/12/2012 3:56 AM, Matthew Mundell wrote:
Is it possible to have an alert email sent when the Threat Count has
increased and not necessarily the Threat Level along with it? Basically
I am trying to get an email sent out when a new open port is discovered
by the "Nmap NASL Wrapper" port scanner regardless of if it has
increased the Threat Level as a result.
No, this is not currently possible.  The only conditions at the moment are
the three that appear in the GSA.

--
Greenbone Networks GmbH
Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrueck, Germany | AG Osnabrueck, HR B 202460
Executive Directors: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner

_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to