Am 11.08.2012 16:16, schrieb Michael Meyer: > *** Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 11.08.2012 15:51, schrieb Michael Meyer: > >>> To believe that this increased security is just wrong. Hiding the >>> banner doesn't make a webserver (or other services) more secure >> >> it makes it not secure by the defintion of secure > > Aha... > >> but it makes automated attacks followed by simplest scans >> less likely in the timewindow between release of a security >> update and install it on the machine > > "man fingerprinting"
man iptables man sysctl.conf below the fingerprinting of a nessus-scan from an external security scan running weekly no, this is really not a printer running on top of HP ProlIant 380DL :-) and yes, the scanner host is excluded from rate-controls anonymous remote-addresses will have it much more difficult to try fingerprintig while permently blocked by ratecontrols ______________ Scan: 04.08.2012 06:27:01 - 04.08.2012 06:38:38 Betriebssystem: KYOCERA Printer openvas can not determine OS nor the webserver too namp the same, so i have seen no single successful fingerprinting on any of the machines i maintain in the last 2 years
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
