Am 25.04.2013 00:31, schrieb Randal T. Rioux: > On 4/24/2013 3:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 25.04.2013 00:15, schrieb Randal T. Rioux: >>> Have an issue with libssh>=0.5.0 for openvas-libraries. Perhaps I'm >>> confusing the requirement - it is libssh2-devel, correct? No other >>> variations appear within the default yum repo. Hopefully it isn't some >>> archaic, abandoned collection of bits! :-) >>> >>> [root@janus openvas-libraries-6.0.0]# cmake . >> >> why do you not simply use the atomic-packages? >> >> [root@openvas:~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release >> CentOS release 6.4 (Final) >> >> [root@openvas:~]$ rpm -qa | grep vas >> openvas-manager-4.0.0-9.el6.art.x86_64 >> openvas-cli-1.2.0-4.el6.art.x86_64 >> openvas-libraries-6.0.0-6.el6.art.x86_64 >> openvas-scanner-3.4.0-5.el6.art.x86_64 >> openvas-administrator-1.3.0-3.el6.art.x86_64 >> openvas-1.0-8.el6.art.noarch > > Bah! I hate when people answer questions with questions. > I am not using non-default repo(s). The reason for this is not relevant
so it's your problem sorry, but i played around more than a year with trying to keep openvas upto-date on Fedora until i had enough and installed a CentOS6 VM with atomic-repos why? because it is generally a stupid idea to have the security scanner not on a dedicated machine and in this case it does not matter which packages you are using > Wait, I'll retort. How was the atomic package compiled? ask them, they are working
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
