Am 30.05.2014 16:04, schrieb Eero Volotinen: > don't use "reply-all" on mailing lists > you break the reply-to-button on others MUA > > Am 30.05.2014 15:46, schrieb Eero Volotinen:> Am 30.05.2014 15:39, > schrieb Eero Volotinen: > > > Trying to build openvas on centos 6, but it fails with following > errors > > > > and why do you waste your time to solve problems others > > already have solved with tested and working packages? > > > > http://openvas.org/install-packages-v6.html#openvas_centos_atomic > > > > Well. because atomic does not provide openvas 7 > > they provide it for Fedora > > your chances to just rebuild the src.rpms likely containing > Redhat specific patches even if you need to modify the SPEC > files are way higher than start from scratch and bypass the > package-management > > i didn't want to dig deeper, but not that long ago i found > src.rpms and they are required anyways to provide them > > http://www3.atomicorp.com/channels/atomic/fedora/19/x86_64/RPMS/ > > Well, it does not work as gnutls might be too old version. maybe it's > possible to recompile newer version of gnutls on centos 6?
GnuTLS again, what a surprise :-) maybe that's the reason why they until now not provide binaries for CentOS6 OpenVAS6 was a few days after the release in the Atomic repos if it's possible Atomic will provide it, they override packages if needed *and* possible, as said: why do you waste *your* time while there are people building that stuff all the time and have more expierience http://updates.atomicorp.com/channels/source/gnutls/ http://updates.atomicorp.com/channels/source/compat-gnutls2/ however, RHEL7-RC exists and works fine until you can live without a public IP and is based on Fedora 19/20
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
