Hey,

seems like the Atomic Repo fixed the most Problems.
Atomic Forum:
"Just made some updates on this for Fedora 17-20 today. I think Ive smoothed 
out most of the rough edges at this point. I could definitely use some other 
eyes on the packaging on this one though!"

https://atomicorp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7675

Just now, i have no time to test it…

Regards

René Behring


Am 03.06.2014 um 07:23 schrieb Eero Volotinen <[email protected]>:

> Can you publish needed modifications as patch (diff) file?
> 
> Eero
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On 02 Jun 2014, at 21:31, Rene Behring <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey
>> 
>>>>> I assume that some Distros via OBS and Atomic might already work.
>>>>> So, please let us know which on worked for you.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, the OpenVAS 6 installation for Fedora is actually OpenVAS 7, you just 
>>>> have to adjust the services after installation.
>>>> As already mentioned:
>>>> http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-discuss/2014-May/006113.html
>>> 
>>> have you send the feedback to the package maintainer so they can fix?
>>> 
>>> Ideally we add the package references for OpenVAS-7 to the page only if it
>>> works out-of-the-box …
>> 
>> I have send an email to the atomic support, they answered:
>> 
>>> Thank you for the inquiry.  Unfortunately the Atomic Repo is a free and 
>>> unsupported repository.
>>> We have made a note of this, but would request that you post this on the 
>>> forums to help keep a
>>> record of this, as well as any other Atomic Repo inquiries.
>> 
>> 
>> So i have posted it on the forum.
>> 
>> René Behring
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openvas-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to