On Montag, 4. August 2014, Rene Behring wrote: > so, if ACT_DESTRUCTIVE_ATTACK, ACT_KILL_HOST and ACT_DENIAL are not executed, > why are there safe_checks? > if they are executed and test with if(safe_checks()) if they should run or > not, why is not in every dangerous NVT a safe_checks?
safe_checks() helps to have unsafe parts within a else safe check. Indeed it seems redundant to use safe_checks() in one of the unsafe categories. -- Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | +49-541-335084-0 | http://www.greenbone.net/ Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460 Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
