Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2014, 15:51:43 schrieb Geoff Galitz:
> FWIW, openvas as a wrapper around other established tools/projects is half
> the point of openvas (to me anyways).  It would be great if the project
> somehow identifies what needs to be done to get these to work again.
> There's no real reason the appropriate scripts/configs cannot be edited or
> added..  just lack of develpment resources.

While I think it is very valuable to have various scan tools managed via 
OpenVAS 
I think it is the wrong appoach to wrap up other tools within a NASL NVT.
Which is something that OpenVAS inherited.
This approach causes several headaches.

This topic was discussed at the last OpenVAS developer conferences and meanwhile
we have started a prototype for the new OSP concept (OpenVAS Scanner Protocol).
w3af serves as a reference for this. We are not yet where we want to be.
But OpenVAS-8 will likely offer something usable.

Please be patient with our limited development resources. We have a couple
of open developer positions at Greenbone btw ;-)
I also can offer to sponsor any OSP wrapper development for the various
other scan tools. You need to be familiar with trunk and Python for this.

-- 
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |  ++49-541-335084-0  |  http://www.greenbone.net/
Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 
202460
Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to