Am 10.07.2015 um 16:24 schrieb W Scott Lockwood III:
I'm sorry, but you're just plain wrong. We're done here.
no, he is *not* wrong, RTFM SELinux manpages and *if* disabled/permissive makes a single difference you need to *exactly* specify your envirnoment *and* report a bug - period
On 7/10/2015 9:24 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:Please, check your facts. Selinux in permissive mode does not block anything. Eero 10.7.2015 5.20 ip. "W Scott Lockwood III" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> kirjoitti: In fact, this IS true. I've had it screw things up even in permissive mode. I've personally observed this. Situations where the only difference between something working and not, was disabling SELinux entirely. On 7/10/2015 9:00 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:This is not true, permissive mode only logs events, blocking is only on enforcing mode.. Eero 10.7.2015 4.39 ip. "W Scott Lockwood III" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> kirjoitti: On 7/10/2015 8:31 AM, Ian Samuel wrote: BTW, I set SELinux as permissive on this machine (instead of disabled): In this mode, SELinux will still cause problems. Best to disable it entirely.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
