Well, I was using nessus professional (commercial edition) for many years, but about two years go I switched to OpenVAS.
For our PCI DSS needs openvas is enought good and it's more flexible than Nessus. I think also that openvas lsc (local checks, patch check) support is better than in Nessus. Of course any vunerability scanner results are not 100% reliable. You always need manual testing to verify findings. -- Eero 2015-10-21 4:51 GMT+03:00 Diego Gomes <[email protected]>: > Hi guys! > > We have here Nessus Professional! > > I identified some different results while comparing... > > For example, I noticed that OpenVAS found more vuls than Nessus. (ok, not > sure if false-positive or mismatch plugin, configuration, etc...) > > But, what I mean is.... > > Should be OpenVAS more efficient than Nessus? Should I trust in one and > not in other? > > Of course, we always need to use 2 different tools for analysis, but my > questions is very interesting and I would like to check your opinions about > it! > > Thanks, > > Diego > > _______________________________________________ > Openvas-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
